Everyone knows that most reviewers are taking Xbox 360’s side for reviews of every game. Specially Halo 3, the game was a over hyped failure in both gameplay and graphics but since the media outlets like IGN, C|Net want to gain Page views and say the game is awesome but in-fact its a small and very low graphic’ed next gen game. So let me get to the point, as everyone knows HAZE the exclusive Halo killer came out couple days ago and it was bombarded by big reviewers such as GameStop, IGN and due to such the game did not sell as Halo 3. I wonder why every time a Halo killer is released it has to be bad, and un-original, when Halo has stolen every aspect of its Online play from Unreal and Quake? Correct me if I’m wrong but when you have billions of dollars to waste on advertising you gain the upper hand on your competition, do you not? At-least Haze has the best graphics next to Crysis on any Console game. I’ve Played GT5P, Call Of Duty, BioShock, Halo 3, RFOM, Gears Of War, GRAW 1/2, RSV. And Haze looks much better than any of them and the story line looks bad to the multi-billion dollar lazy reviewers b/c. A. there not giving the game a PAID rating, or B. they don’t want to give good rating to a game that was designed by a low budget game company compared to a game paid by Microsoft and Hyped even more by MS-dollars. Oh I wonder why GAT IV got 10/10 when it should’ve gotten a 6.5/10 for having close to nothing next to GTA SA, Oh B/C they like GTA Series so it automatically got a 10.
Popularity: 4%
